Another Argument for more Public Access AED's

Another Argument for more Public Access AED's

Cardiac Arrest in Homes vs. in Public Settings

Shockable rhythms are more common in public settings.

In a prospective, multicenter cohort study of 14,420 adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the U.S. and Canada between 2005 and 2007, researchers assessed initial rhythm, use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), survival, and location of arrest (residential vs. public setting).

Among 12,930 patients who had known initial rhythms or had received at least one shock from a bystander-applied AED, arrests were witnessed by bystanders in 39%, AEDs were applied by bystanders in 2%, and arrests were witnessed by emergency medical services (EMS) in 9%. Ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia was the initial rhythm in significantly more public arrests than home arrests among those witnessed by bystanders (60% vs. 35%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.28), those witnessed by EMS (38% vs. 25%; AOR, 1.63), and those with AEDs applied by bystanders (79% vs. 36%; AOR, 4.48). The overall rate of survival to hospital discharge for patients with known initial rhythms was 7%. Among patients at home, survival rates were 2% for unwitnessed arrests, 8% for witnessed arrests overall, 10% for witnessed arrests with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and 12% for witnessed arrests with bystander-applied AEDs. For patients with bystander-witnessed public arrests, survival rates were 20% overall, 34% for those with bystander-applied AEDs, and 42% for those with bystander-administered shocks. Survival rates were comparable for patients who received bystander-administered AED shocks in public and at home.

Comment: This large multicenter study reaffirms the clear survival benefit of AED programs for public settings. AEDs do not substantially improve the benefits of bystander CPR for arrests at home, suggesting that CPR training should take precedence over widespread deployment of AEDs for the home setting.

— J. Stephen Bohan, MD, MS, FACP, FACEP

Published in Journal Watch Emergency Medicine January 26, 2011

Bob Trenkamp's picture
Bob Trenkamp wrote 8 years 37 weeks ago

The posting of Dr. Bohan's paper (above)

Dr. Bohan's observation is clearly correct in today's environment. A different conclusion would result if personal AED's were available for $300. Meanwhile, Bystanders need to learn CPR for use in public and at home, and they need to learn how to use an AED so that, when an AED is available, it can be used promptly.

Bob Trenkamp, President
Saving Lives In Chatham County
www.slicc.org

sadashiv's picture
sadashiv wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

good

Thanks for the good work https://downloadstatus.xyz/category/sad/ It is praisable to visit and read the article.

Mission & Vision

The mission of the Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) Foundation is to prevent death and disability from sudden cardiac arrest. The vision of the SCA Foundation is to increase awareness about sudden cardiac arrest and influence attitudinal and behavioral changes that will reduce mortality and morbidity from SCA.

SCA Newsletter

Sign Up with the SCA Foundation News in order to stay informed! (* required field)

Contact Us

The Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation would like to hear from you! If you have questions or comments — Contact Us!

724-625-0025

Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation
7500 Brooktree Road
Wexford, PA 15090

Copyright © 2019 Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Web Design & Development, & Web Hosting By FastWebEngine